IT engineer conducting software tests in a high-tech data center as part of software quality assurance services.

Quality Assurance Services

Software Quality Assurance Services

Build software users love. Our software quality assurance services ensure every release exceeds expectations.

Focus areas

Unit and Integration Testing

We assess individual component functionality through unit testing and ensure seamless interaction between components through integration testing.

Unit and Integration Testing

Unit and Integration Testing

Functional and Acceptance Testing

Our engineers verify that the software aligns with specified functional requirements and meets the established acceptance criteria.

Functional and Acceptance Testing

Functional and Acceptance Testing

Performance and Compatibility Testing

We evaluate software performance under varying loads and ensure it operates seamlessly across different environments and configurations.

Performance and Compatibility Testing

Performance and Compatibility Testing

Security Testing

Our team identifies vulnerabilities and ensure the software can withstand cyberattacks, countering potential security risks.

Security Testing

Security Testing

Usability and Localization Testing

These tests help us evaluate ease of use, navigation, and UX, software adaptability to different languages, regions, and cultures.

Usability and Localization Testing

Usability and Localization Testing

Regression Testing

Our team verifies new code changes don’t break existing features or introduce unexpected bugs after modifications.

Regression Testing

Regression Testing

Smoke and Sanity Testing

Engineers quickly confirm build stability and core functionality performance before proceeding with deeper testing.

Smoke and Sanity Testing

Smoke and Sanity Testing

Exploratory Testing

QA specialists investigate without predefined scripts to discover unexpected behaviors and potential improvement areas.

Exploratory Testing

Exploratory Testing

Alpha and Beta Testing

Internal evaluation precedes carefully monitored real-user testing during pre-release stages for comprehensive feedback.

Alpha and Beta Testing

Alpha and Beta Testing

Automated Testing

Specialized tools execute repetitive test scenarios, comparing actual with expected outcomes for efficient evaluation.

Automated Testing

Automated Testing

Unit and Integration Testing

Unit and Integration Testing

We assess individual component functionality through unit testing and ensure seamless interaction between components through integration testing.

Functional and Acceptance Testing

Functional and Acceptance Testing

Our engineers verify that the software aligns with specified functional requirements and meets the established acceptance criteria.

Performance and Compatibility Testing

Performance and Compatibility Testing

We evaluate software performance under varying loads and ensure it operates seamlessly across different environments and configurations.

Security Testing

Security Testing

Our team identifies vulnerabilities and ensure the software can withstand cyberattacks, countering potential security risks.

Usability and Localization Testing

Usability and Localization Testing

These tests help us evaluate ease of use, navigation, and UX, software adaptability to different languages, regions, and cultures.

Regression Testing

Regression Testing

Our team verifies new code changes don’t break existing features or introduce unexpected bugs after modifications.

Smoke and Sanity Testing

Smoke and Sanity Testing

Engineers quickly confirm build stability and core functionality performance before proceeding with deeper testing.

Exploratory Testing

Exploratory Testing

QA specialists investigate without predefined scripts to discover unexpected behaviors and potential improvement areas.

Alpha and Beta Testing

Alpha and Beta Testing

Internal evaluation precedes carefully monitored real-user testing during pre-release stages for comprehensive feedback.

Automated Testing

Automated Testing

Specialized tools execute repetitive test scenarios, comparing actual with expected outcomes for efficient evaluation.

How we work

1 of 8
1

Requirement Analysis

Our journey begins with a deep dive into your project’s unique requirements. Our team of quality assurance professionals collaborates closely with project managers, developers, and stakeholders to gain a crystal-clear understanding of your software’s ultimate goals.

2

Test Planning

Based on the requirements, our team creates a comprehensive test plan that forms the backbone of our quality assurance process. This plan outlines the scope of testing, sets test objectives, schedules our testing efforts, and allocates resources. It also defines the testing strategies and methodologies to be used.

3

Test Design

During this stage, our QA engineers design test cases and test scripts, mapping out specific scenarios and conditions to explore. These documents cover everything from input conditions to expected results and acceptance criteria. Simultaneously, we prepare the test data and environments required to ensure a thorough examination.

4

Test Execution

This is where the actual testing begins. Our QA engineers execute the test cases and scripts, using various testing techniques such as functional testing, security testing, load testing, and more, depending on your project’s needs. Then they record their findings, and if any defects surface, collaborate with our development team to address them.

5

Regression Testing

After resolving defects, we perform regression testing to ensure the software remains rock-solid. We want to make certain that every change introduced has no unintended side effects, and your software continues to function flawlessly.

6

User Acceptance Testing (UAT)

Before launching your software into the world, we perform the User Acceptance Testing (UAT) in collaboration with your stakeholders and end-users to ensure the software aligns with their expectations and requirements.

7

Deployment

Once our QA team has confirmed that the software is ready, it’s deployed to the production environment.

8

Continuous Monitoring and Improvement

Our commitment to quality doesn’t stop with deployment. We maintain vigilant watch over your software in the live environment, addressing any emerging issues promptly. We actively seek feedback from you and your stakeholders, constantly evaluating our QA process to drive continuous improvement.

Contact us

Get guaranteed results and maximise business value

Robotics is the new black in the world of digital transformation.
Contact us now

Quality Assurance for Healthcare

Our team rigorously tests healthcare software to ensure data security, regulatory compliance, and patient confidentiality.

We prioritize the reliability and accuracy of healthcare systems.

QA for Healthcare

QA for Manufacturing

QA for Restaurants

QA for Finance

QA for Healthcare

Our team rigorously tests healthcare software to ensure data security, regulatory compliance, and patient confidentiality.

We prioritize the reliability and accuracy of healthcare systems.

QA for Manufacturing

When assuring the quality of software for the manufacturing industry, our focus is on optimizing processes, reducing defects, and enhancing software reliability.

We ensure that manufacturing software operates seamlessly to improve efficiency.

QA for Restaurants

We concentrate on usability, reliability, and performance when testing restaurant software.

Our aim is to deliver a seamless dining experience for customers while streamlining operations for restaurant owners.

QA for Finance

Our meticulous testing in the finance sector centers on data accuracy, fraud prevention, and regulatory compliance.

We prioritize the financial well-being of our clients and their customers, ensuring trust and security in financial services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is your approach to testing, and how do you use test automation?

We follow a risk-based testing approach and adapt it to each project. We manually test key user journeys using functional and exploratory testing. Developers also write unit and integration tests when they are relevant to the scope and risk of the solution.

We usually recommend test automation for critical and high-risk flows, such as regression testing, but the scope of automation is agreed with the client. Some teams invest in broader automated test suites, while others focus more on manual testing with a smaller set of automated checks. Our goal is to strike a practical balance between quality, speed, cost, and risk rather than apply a one-size-fits-all testing model.

How do you assess and address QA gaps when a project starts?

We take a pragmatic approach during onboarding. We review the existing QA setup, including current tests, how they are run, and known problem areas. We then look for obvious gaps in critical flows, such as payments or core user journeys. If we identify serious gaps, we agree on a short list of actions to address them early, for example basic smoke tests, regression checks, or additional monitoring.

After onboarding, most new and updated test cases are created alongside new features and releases, as well as when high-risk areas are changed. The level of formal gap analysis and automation is agreed with a client based on risk and budget. This helps us avoid over-engineering while keeping the most important parts of the system well protected.

How does AI support your code review process in real projects?

We use AI-assisted tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI as part of our regular code review process. They help us quickly identify risk areas such as weak error handling, insecure patterns, or inconsistent library usage. They also highlight sections that need closer human review.

When we join an existing project, these tools help us understand the codebase more quickly by summarizing modules and mapping dependencies. This speeds up onboarding, improves early security and quality checks, and results in more consistent, reliable code. All final decisions remain with our engineers.

What QA metrics do you track?

We track a small set of practical QA metrics and avoid heavy KPI frameworks. Typical metrics include the number of defects per release, grouped by severity, and whether they were found in testing or in production. We also track pass and fail results for smoke and regression checks before a release, when automated tests are in place.
In addition, we look at how quickly critical defects are fixed, how often issues are reopened, and the trend of production incidents after releases. 
We agree on the exact metrics and level of reporting with the client. If needed, we can also report more formal metrics such as defect density or test coverage.

How do you assess the impact of a new or modified requirement on cost, time, and quality?

We conduct a small impact analysis before agreeing to a change. Typically, we:

- Make sure we fully understand the change, why it’s requested, and what will stay the same.
- Review the affected modules, integrations, and data structures to assess their complexity.
- Estimate the extra effort needed for development, testing, and rework, and how it will impact the plan and budget.
- Identify critical flows that will be affected, any additional testing needed, production risks, and required refactoring.
- Present the impact in simple terms and agree on the next steps with the client.

We keep track of all approved changes in the shared backlog. Updated estimates and priorities show how costs, time, and quality will be affected.

Our experts

We are experts in software and hardware engineering. By using and combining cutting edge technologies, we create unique solutions that transform industries.

Sergey

Sergey

Lead Software QA Engineer

I currently hold the position of Lead Test Quality Assurance Engineer, specializing in e-Learning projects. My key responsibility is to define testing strategies to make sure the end product meets the industry’s and company’s standards.

As a QA team manager, I create testing plans, run team meetings to brainstorm solutions to problems, and ensure the work is done on time and quality. My job also involves constant communication with the development team and the customer to communicate the needs and requirements of all participants of the project.

Sergey1

Sergey

Lead Software QA Engineer

Anna1

Anna

Senior engineer QA-A

Sergey2

Sergey

Lead Software QA Engineer

I currently hold the position of Lead Test Quality Assurance Engineer, specializing in e-Learning projects. My key responsibility is to define testing strategies to make sure the end product meets the industry’s and company’s standards.

As a QA team manager, I create testing plans, run team meetings to brainstorm solutions to problems, and ensure the work is done on time and quality. My job also involves constant communication with the development team and the customer to communicate the needs and requirements of all participants of the project.

Learn more
Anna2

Anna

Senior engineer QA-A

For the past seven years, I have been delivering comprehensive quality assurance across healthcare, finance, e-learning, and AI-driven restaurant management systems, ensuring robust software reliability through strategic testing methodologies.

I have been leading automated testing initiatives using Java, Selenium WebDriver, and REST Assured, while integrating quality processes into CI/CD pipelines. I am directing QA teams through complex project lifecycles, mentoring team members, and collaborating with cross-functional Agile teams to deliver high-quality software solutions.

I have extensive expertise in system evaluation, test design, and end-user support, and consistently optimize testing processes across web, mobile, and API platforms.

Learn more